8 Jul 2024 Council meeting Housing

Development Variance Permit Application No. DVP464 - 1610 Loat Street

Motion
That Council issue Development Variance Permit No. DVP464 for a single residential dwelling and accessory building at 1610 Loat Street with variances outlined as in the “Proposed Variances” section of the Staff Report, titled “Development Variance Permit Application No. DVP464 - 1610 Loat Street”, dated 2024- JUL-08.
Minutes, page 9
Sources
Agenda itemCity agenda
Staff reportPage 2
Purpose
To present for Council’s consideration a development variance permit application for a proposed single residential dwelling and accessory building at 1610 Loat Street.
Staff report, page 2
Staff recommendation
That Council issue Development Variance Permit No. DVP464 for a single residential dwelling and accessory building at 1610 Loat Street with variances outlined as in the “Proposed Variances” section of the Staff Report dated 2024-JUL-08.
Staff report, page 2
DocumentsStaff report about Housing, Land Use & Urban Form

Questions and answers

Councillor Paul Manly
Speaker identificationConfident
Yes

asked
Do you have a question? Councillor Gesselbrock? No. Thank you. Councillor Manley? Yeah just a clarification from staff because when I'm looking at this report I'm seeing a variance for the setbacks but I'm not seeing the variance for height. Is there an issue with the height of the building? Is there a balance for that?
J. Holm
Speaker identificationConfident
answeredDirector, Planning and Development
No, that would be confirmed through the... what's proposed is in compliance with the by-law, but obviously through the building permitting process, if this were to move on to that stage, the by-law requirements would be reconfirmed there as well. But yeah, the height as proposed is within by-law provisions as it's shown on the table. Thank you. Thank you.

Councillor Tyler Brown
Speaker identificationConfident
Yes

asked
Just a quick question to you to staff. There's no building elevations in the package, is there? There was just reference to heights and things like that. But I just want to make in something that's correct it's just referenced in the table okay so like
J. Holm
Speaker identificationConfident
answeredDirector, Planning and Development
Elevation but not building okay thank you they reference sorry the drawings reference the maximum permitted height but did not the proposed height the building height unless varied would have to meet the bylaw requirements thank you