9 Jun 2025 Council meeting Environment

Proposed Removal of Park Dedication from a Portion of 1631 Naylor Crescent (Elaine Hamilton Park) (Part 1)

Motions decided by one vote
That “Parks Dedication Amendment Bylaw 2025 No. 2255.01” (a bylaw to remove dedication as public park from a portion of “Elaine Hamilton Park” [formerly known as Trofton Park] at 1631 Naylor Crescent for road dedication purposes) pass first reading.
That “Parks Dedication Amendment Bylaw 2025 No. 2255.01” pass second reading.
That “Parks Dedication Amendment Bylaw 2025 No. 2255.01” pass third reading.
The City’s vote record words it differently
That “Parks Dedication Amendment Bylaw 2025 No. 2255.01” (a bylaw to remove dedication as public park from a portion of “Elaine Hamilton Park” [formerly known as Trofton Park] at 1631 Naylor Crescent for road dedication purposes) pass first three readings.
Sources
Agenda itemCity agenda
Staff reportPage 1
Purpose
To seek Council approval to remove the park dedication from a portion of City-owned parkland located at 1631 Naylor Crescent, Elaine Hamilton Park (previously known as Trofton Park ) to dedicate it as road right -of-way in order to provide access through 1618 Extension Road to 1750 Rajeena Way.
Staff recommendation
That: 1. “Parks Dedication Amendment Bylaw 2025 No. 2255.01” (a bylaw to remove dedication as public park from a portion of “Elaine Hamilton Park” [formerly known as Trofton Park] at 1631 Naylor Crescent for road dedication purposes) pass first reading. 2. “Parks Dedication Amendment Bylaw 2025 No. 2255.01” pass second reading. 3. “Parks Dedication Amendment Bylaw 2025 No. 2255.01” pass third reading. 4. Council authorize the Mayor and Corporate Officer to execute the Road Dedication Agreement to effect the transaction.
DocumentsStaff report about Environment & Natural Resources, Parks & Recreation, Transportation & Mobility

Janice Perrino Yes

Councilor Prince. The city acquired the property in 1978. So it's at least settled. So a good time to get a new bathroom. Okay, but. The other piece that councilor Manley brought up was the. $45,000 for the one acre. The actual park itself is over 7 ha. Or is it? Seven acres. I apologize. 7.31 acres. What I'm suggesting is that the $45,000 is only the piece from the beginning of the park. To the edge of the park, right? Correct. It's a long strip.