That the motion be amended to add a fifth option to keep the property intact without any affordable housing on it.
Procedural vote
Councilor Armstrong, Caprino and Gasol. Brock in order. Thank you. I can't support that amendment without knowing how much it will cost us and where the money is going to come from, because it is in the report that we would have to change our funding model, and I don't know if we even have the money to be able to change that. So Ah, for that reason I can't support that at this time. . Thank you. .
Cancer. Manly Thank you worship. I am not opposed to having affordable housing on this property. I just think it's a good idea to leave all the options open to the public to be able to To look at them and to provide feedback. And ultimately, this will come back to council as a council decision and will decide what what is best for this property at that time. Thank you. Thank
But why would you So let me phrase this differently. Why would we put this as part of them as part of the motion when we have none of the other? ? Options listed as part of the recommendation. I understand that, but I'm what I'm wondering, is is we don't have all of them listed, or am I wrong? ?
Your Yeah, your worship just to clarify the concept plan that will be going to the public for consultation currently included four options and councillor. Manley's amendment adds 1/5 option. . Okay, , Thank you. .